| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
WICKS, J.; BELINE, M.; GOMEZ, J.F.M.; LUZARDO, S.; SILVA, S.L.; GERRARD, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
JORDAN WICKS, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA.; MARIANE BELINE; JUAN FERNANDO MORALES GOMEZ, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.; SANTIAGO FELIPE LUZARDO VILLAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SAULO LUZ SILVA, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.; DAVID GERRARD, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA. |
|
Título : |
Muscle Energy Metabolism, Growth, and Meat Quality in Beef Cattle. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agriculture, v. 9, no. 9, 2019. |
|
DOI : |
10.3390/agriculture9090195 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received: 16 July 2019 // Accepted: 2 September 2019 // Published: 7 September 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: World meat production must increase substantially to support current projections in population growth over the next 30 years. However, maximizing product quality remains a focus for many in the meat industry, as incremental increases in product quality often signal potential increases
in segment profitability. Moreover, increases in meat quality also address concerns raised by an ever-growing auent society demanding greater eating satisfaction. Production strategies and valued endpoints dier worldwide, though this makes the global marketing of meat challenging. Moreover,
this variation in production schemes makes it dicult for the scientific community to understand precisely those mechanisms controlling beef quality. For example, some cattle are produced in low input, extensive, forage-based systems. In contrast, some producers raise cattle in more intensive
operations where feeding programs are strategically designed to maximal growth rates and achieve significant fat deposition. Yet, others produce cattle that perform between these two extremes. Fresh meat quality, somewhat like the variation observed in production strategies, is perceived dierently
across the globe. Even so, meat quality is largely predicated on those characteristics visible at the retail counter, namely color and perceived texture and firmness. Once purchased, however, the eating experience is a function of flavor and tenderness. In this review, we attempt to identify a few areas
where animal growth may impact postmortem energy metabolism and thereby alter meat quality. Understanding how animals grow and how this aects meat quality development is incumbent to all vested in the meat industry. MenosAbstract: World meat production must increase substantially to support current projections in population growth over the next 30 years. However, maximizing product quality remains a focus for many in the meat industry, as incremental increases in product quality often signal potential increases
in segment profitability. Moreover, increases in meat quality also address concerns raised by an ever-growing auent society demanding greater eating satisfaction. Production strategies and valued endpoints dier worldwide, though this makes the global marketing of meat challenging. Moreover,
this variation in production schemes makes it dicult for the scientific community to understand precisely those mechanisms controlling beef quality. For example, some cattle are produced in low input, extensive, forage-based systems. In contrast, some producers raise cattle in more intensive
operations where feeding programs are strategically designed to maximal growth rates and achieve significant fat deposition. Yet, others produce cattle that perform between these two extremes. Fresh meat quality, somewhat like the variation observed in production strategies, is perceived dierently
across the globe. Even so, meat quality is largely predicated on those characteristics visible at the retail counter, namely color and perceived texture and firmness. Once purchased, however, the eating experience is a function of flavor and tenderness. In this review, we attempt to identify a few areas
where animal g... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANIMALS; BEEF; COLOR; GROWTH; MEAT QUALITY; MUSCLE; TENDERNESS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/13328/1/Luzardo-2019.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02529naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1016091
005 2019-09-24
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3390/agriculture9090195$2DOI
100 1 $aWICKS, J.
245 $aMuscle Energy Metabolism, Growth, and Meat Quality in Beef Cattle.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aOPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received: 16 July 2019 // Accepted: 2 September 2019 // Published: 7 September 2019.
520 $aAbstract: World meat production must increase substantially to support current projections in population growth over the next 30 years. However, maximizing product quality remains a focus for many in the meat industry, as incremental increases in product quality often signal potential increases in segment profitability. Moreover, increases in meat quality also address concerns raised by an ever-growing auent society demanding greater eating satisfaction. Production strategies and valued endpoints dier worldwide, though this makes the global marketing of meat challenging. Moreover, this variation in production schemes makes it dicult for the scientific community to understand precisely those mechanisms controlling beef quality. For example, some cattle are produced in low input, extensive, forage-based systems. In contrast, some producers raise cattle in more intensive operations where feeding programs are strategically designed to maximal growth rates and achieve significant fat deposition. Yet, others produce cattle that perform between these two extremes. Fresh meat quality, somewhat like the variation observed in production strategies, is perceived dierently across the globe. Even so, meat quality is largely predicated on those characteristics visible at the retail counter, namely color and perceived texture and firmness. Once purchased, however, the eating experience is a function of flavor and tenderness. In this review, we attempt to identify a few areas where animal growth may impact postmortem energy metabolism and thereby alter meat quality. Understanding how animals grow and how this aects meat quality development is incumbent to all vested in the meat industry.
653 $aANIMALS
653 $aBEEF
653 $aCOLOR
653 $aGROWTH
653 $aMEAT QUALITY
653 $aMUSCLE
653 $aTENDERNESS
700 1 $aBELINE, M.
700 1 $aGOMEZ, J.F.M.
700 1 $aLUZARDO, S.
700 1 $aSILVA, S.L.
700 1 $aGERRARD, D.
773 $tAgriculture$gv. 9, no. 9, 2019.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
14/06/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
04/11/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
OLIVERA-MUZANTE, J.; FIERRO, S.; ALABART, J.L.; CLARAMUNT, M.; MINTEGUIAGA, M.A.; AUNCHAYNA, G.; ERRANDONEA, N.; BANCHERO, G. |
|
Afiliación : |
Laboratorio de Reproducción Animal “Dr. Alfredo Ferraris”, Departamento de Ovinos, Lanas y Caprinos, Facultad de Veterinaria, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, 60000, Uruguay.; Secretariado Uruguayo de la Lana (S.U.L.), Área de Transferencia de Tecnología, Servando Gómez 2408, Montevideo, 12100, Uruguay.; Unidad de Producción y Sanidad Animal, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain / dInstituto Agroalimentario de Aragón – IA2 (CITA-Universidad), Spain.; Grupo multidisciplinario de ecología para la agricultura, Centro Universitario Regional Este, Universidad de la República, Ruta 8 km 292, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay.; Laboratorio de Reproducción Animal “Dr. Alfredo Ferraris”, Departamento de Salud en los Sistemas Pecuarios, Facultad de Veterinaria, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, 60000, Uruguay.; Veterinary Doctor, Liberal Exercise of Profession, Mercedes, Soriano, Uruguay.; Veterinary Doctor, Liberal Exercise of Profession, Tomás Gomensoro, Artigas, Uruguay.; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Short-term dietary protein supplementation improves reproductive performance of estrous-synchronized ewes when there are long intervals of prostaglandin or progesterone-based treatments for timed AI. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Reproduction Science, July 2019, Volume 206, Pages 78-84. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.05.011 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 21 November 2018 //Received in revised form 9 May 2019// Accepted23May2019//Available online 25 May 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:To evaluate the reproductive effects of a short-term dietary protein supplementation (Days -10 to -3) before timed AI (TAI = Day 0), 471 Merino ewes grazing native pastures were estrous-synchronized when there were either long intervals between prostaglandin administrations (two prostaglandin injections 15 or 16 d apart; PG15 and PG16, respectively) or with a progesterone-eCG (P4-eCG) protocol, resulting in a 3 × 2 experimental design. Ovulation rate on Day 8 (OR), non-estrous-return to Day 21 (NRR21), and fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 70 were evaluated. The interaction between estrous synchronization protocol and supplementation was not significant for any of these variables (P > 0.05). Supplementation increased OR, prolificacy and fecundity (+0.14, +0.15 and +0.14, respectively, P < 0.01), but did not affect NRR21 or fertility of ewes (+6.2% and +6.7% respectively, P > 0.05). Ewes treated using the PG15 and PG16 protocols had a lesser OR (-0.27), prolificacy (?0.22) and fecundity (?0.20) than ewes treated using P4-eCG protocol (P < 0.01 for each), and similar NRR21 and fertility (?5.4% and ?7.9% respectively, P > 0.05 for both variables), without significant differences between the PG15 and PG16 groups. In conclusion, a short-term dietary protein supplementationbefore TAI improved OR, prolificacy and fecundity of ewes which were estrous-synchronized by imposing long interval PG (15 or 16 d apart) or P4-eCG-based protocols. There was a greater OR, prolificacy and fecundity when there was use of the P4-eCG compared to longinterval PG-based protocols. Estrous-non-return rate after AI and fertility as a result TAI were not affected by either the supplementation or the estrous synchronization protocols used. MenosAbstract:To evaluate the reproductive effects of a short-term dietary protein supplementation (Days -10 to -3) before timed AI (TAI = Day 0), 471 Merino ewes grazing native pastures were estrous-synchronized when there were either long intervals between prostaglandin administrations (two prostaglandin injections 15 or 16 d apart; PG15 and PG16, respectively) or with a progesterone-eCG (P4-eCG) protocol, resulting in a 3 × 2 experimental design. Ovulation rate on Day 8 (OR), non-estrous-return to Day 21 (NRR21), and fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 70 were evaluated. The interaction between estrous synchronization protocol and supplementation was not significant for any of these variables (P > 0.05). Supplementation increased OR, prolificacy and fecundity (+0.14, +0.15 and +0.14, respectively, P < 0.01), but did not affect NRR21 or fertility of ewes (+6.2% and +6.7% respectively, P > 0.05). Ewes treated using the PG15 and PG16 protocols had a lesser OR (-0.27), prolificacy (?0.22) and fecundity (?0.20) than ewes treated using P4-eCG protocol (P < 0.01 for each), and similar NRR21 and fertility (?5.4% and ?7.9% respectively, P > 0.05 for both variables), without significant differences between the PG15 and PG16 groups. In conclusion, a short-term dietary protein supplementationbefore TAI improved OR, prolificacy and fecundity of ewes which were estrous-synchronized by imposing long interval PG (15 or 16 d apart) or P4-eCG-based protocols. There was a greater OR, pro... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EWE; FERTILITY; FOCUS FEEDING; PROGESTERONE; PROSTAGLANDIN; TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION. |
|
Thesagro : |
OVEJAS; REPRODUCCION ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L53 Fisiología Animal - Reproducción |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02928naa a2200325 a 4500
001 1059854
005 2019-11-04
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.05.011$2DOI
100 1 $aOLIVERA-MUZANTE, J.
245 $aShort-term dietary protein supplementation improves reproductive performance of estrous-synchronized ewes when there are long intervals of prostaglandin or progesterone-based treatments for timed AI.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aArticle history: Received 21 November 2018 //Received in revised form 9 May 2019// Accepted23May2019//Available online 25 May 2019.
520 $aAbstract:To evaluate the reproductive effects of a short-term dietary protein supplementation (Days -10 to -3) before timed AI (TAI = Day 0), 471 Merino ewes grazing native pastures were estrous-synchronized when there were either long intervals between prostaglandin administrations (two prostaglandin injections 15 or 16 d apart; PG15 and PG16, respectively) or with a progesterone-eCG (P4-eCG) protocol, resulting in a 3 × 2 experimental design. Ovulation rate on Day 8 (OR), non-estrous-return to Day 21 (NRR21), and fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 70 were evaluated. The interaction between estrous synchronization protocol and supplementation was not significant for any of these variables (P > 0.05). Supplementation increased OR, prolificacy and fecundity (+0.14, +0.15 and +0.14, respectively, P < 0.01), but did not affect NRR21 or fertility of ewes (+6.2% and +6.7% respectively, P > 0.05). Ewes treated using the PG15 and PG16 protocols had a lesser OR (-0.27), prolificacy (?0.22) and fecundity (?0.20) than ewes treated using P4-eCG protocol (P < 0.01 for each), and similar NRR21 and fertility (?5.4% and ?7.9% respectively, P > 0.05 for both variables), without significant differences between the PG15 and PG16 groups. In conclusion, a short-term dietary protein supplementationbefore TAI improved OR, prolificacy and fecundity of ewes which were estrous-synchronized by imposing long interval PG (15 or 16 d apart) or P4-eCG-based protocols. There was a greater OR, prolificacy and fecundity when there was use of the P4-eCG compared to longinterval PG-based protocols. Estrous-non-return rate after AI and fertility as a result TAI were not affected by either the supplementation or the estrous synchronization protocols used.
650 $aOVEJAS
650 $aREPRODUCCION ANIMAL
653 $aEWE
653 $aFERTILITY
653 $aFOCUS FEEDING
653 $aPROGESTERONE
653 $aPROSTAGLANDIN
653 $aTIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
700 1 $aFIERRO, S.
700 1 $aALABART, J.L.
700 1 $aCLARAMUNT, M.
700 1 $aMINTEGUIAGA, M.A.
700 1 $aAUNCHAYNA, G.
700 1 $aERRANDONEA, N.
700 1 $aBANCHERO, G.
773 $tAnimal Reproduction Science, July 2019, Volume 206, Pages 78-84.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
